Super Street Network

Due to the EU’s Global Data Protection Regulation, our website is currently unavailable to visitors from most European countries. We apologize for this inconvenience and encourage you to visit for the latest on new cars, car reviews and news, concept cars and auto show coverage, awards and much more.MOTORTREND.COM
 |   |  Pre-VTEC Oddity - Editorial
Subscribe to the Free

Pre-VTEC Oddity - Editorial

Many manufacturers considered stratified-charge technology, but only Honda successfully implemented it.

Aaron Bonk
May 24, 2011

Roughly two decades before VTEC, low-emissions pioneer Honda began experimenting with valve manipulation for the sake of lower emissions. Relatively new to automotive manufacturing at that time, the Japanese carmaker rejected the idea of catalytic converters, and instead believed its stratified-charge CVCC (Compound Vortex Controlled Combustion) engine configuration was the answer to low emissions. Stratified-charge engines that inject fuel into the cylinders before ignition were nothing newthey dated back to the early 1900s. The design reduces combustion temperatures and detonation, improves cycle efficiency, reduces heat loss, and lowers pumping losses. It doesn’t do much for power but, then again, that wasn’t Honda’s intention 35 years ago. Although CVCC engines were used by the brand for more than a decade among their various platforms (Civic, Prelude, etc.), today we file them up alongside such seldom used and outdated technologies like ATTS (Active Torque Transfer System) and 4WS (4-Wheel Steering).

Htup_1106_01_o+pre vtec oddity+aaron bonk Photo 2/2   |   Pre-VTEC Oddity - Editorial

Developed in 1968 and released just four years later, Honda’s CVCC success came at a time when fuel costs peaked and the United States’ Clean Air Act provisions forced automakers to consider alternative engine options. Many manufacturers considered stratified-charge technology, but only Honda successfully implemented it. The results were better gas mileage and improved emissions when compared to conventional engines of similar output, even those using catalytic converters. The new technology, which competitors hailing from Detroit labeled as unpractical and unreliable, helped boost Honda’s U.S. market share to unprecedented levels, arguably positioning the company for its later compact car domination.

Introduced to North America in 1975 under the guise of the Honda Civic, the CVCC engine operates similarly to a conventional, four-stroke, internal combustion engine save for a small auxiliary combustion chamber positioned around each spark plug and a small auxiliary intake valve paired with each cylinder. (Think: a combustion chamber inside of a combustion chamber.) During the intake stroke, the three-barrel carburetor injects a relatively rich air/fuel mixture (about five percent of the charge) past its auxiliary barrel into the auxiliary combustion chamber. A leaner air/fuel mixture (about 95-percent of the charge) is then injected into the cylinder that, when later combined with the first charge, still results in a relatively lean mixture. When the spark plug fires, the rich mixture ignites quickly, like any rich mixture would, which then ignites the lean mixture easier than expected, creating a swirl effect. The burn is slow, allowing time for more complete combustion, and results in less carbon-monoxide as well as fewer hydrocarbons and nitrogen-oxides, which leads to cleaner emissions but less horsepower ... by 1975’s standards anyways.

Honda’s unique combustion chamber shape and separate rich and lean intake charges created the vortex effect its engine designers were looking for. Later designs sold outside of North America incorporated more refined carburetors, even fuel injection, just before the CVCC’s demise. Interestingly enough, Honda completed its first 100 CVCC engines prior to the Civics they were destined for. As such, test engines were installed in Nissan Sunny bodies (Honda had yet to produce any car large enough to accept the CVCC engine) and sent it to the chassis dyno for further analysis. Even Toyota, Isuzu, and once-doubting U.S. automakers joined in, eventually licensing the technology from Honda for their own use. In a 1973 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency hearing, the group looked to Honda, one of only two OEMs able to meet the federal organization’s new emissions guidelines, asking the company if it could potentially supply engines to domestic automakers like General Motors should they not be able to meet soon-to-be-implemented regulations. Of course, that never happened, and instead, emissions regulations were postponed two more years, giving the domestics time to play catch-up.

CVCC technology has stood the test of time but is all but forgotten among today’s Hondaphiles even though it was officially recognized among Japan’s Mechanical Engineering Heritage in 2007. Let’s not forget the things that have made Honda great as we continue to look ahead toward the things that’ll move the company forward, lest one day we just might have this same conversation about a little something called VTEC.

By Aaron Bonk
413 Articles



Preview the April 2019 issue of Super Street, with the first modified A90 Supra (sort of), an underground RX-7 drifter, Carbon Signal’s threesome of Datsun, and more!
Bob HernandezFeb 15, 2019
The G-Class has changed a lot since the 460-series debuted in 1979. Today, the G-wagon is now as much an S-Class as it is an off-roader
Bradley IgerFeb 15, 2019
Iconic livery and 420 whp transform this classic Mazda.
Benjamin HuntingFeb 14, 2019
That's about what the Honda Civic Type R makes and nearly twice as much power as we got from the last Mini JCW GP back in 2012
Collin WoodardFeb 13, 2019
Created exclusively for Japan, the model gets no powertrain upgrades but looks fantastic enough that we don’t really care.
Ed TahaneyFeb 13, 2019
Sponsored Links